After the Horowitz Report, Attorney General Barr percipiently asked the most important question about the Russiagate collusion hoax: what was the FBI’s rationale for continuing on with the Russiagate collusion investigation after the collapse of its predicate as a result of the interview of Igor Danchenko, Steele’s Primary Sub-Source?
The FBI's NYC field office? You mean the one that General Gribanov's Department 14 of the Second Chief Directorate (today's FSB) sent GRU Colonel Dmitry Polyakov to in late 1961 and KGB Major Aleksei Kulak to in early 1962 to "volunteer" to spy for it at the UN six months before it sent false defector Yuri Nosenko to the CIA in Geneva to discredit what a recent true defector, KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, was telling the CIA about possible KGB penetrations of itself and the intelligence services of our NATO allies?
The time limit for prosecution of lying to congress with a fake talking points memo seems to be 5 years. But the clock could be reset by bringing them back to testify again and allow them to confess or lie again.
Why didn't the FBI resume investigating Danchenko as a possible SVR/FSB/GRU agent in 2015 or so?
The FBI's NYC field office? You mean the one that General Gribanov's Department 14 of the Second Chief Directorate (today's FSB) sent GRU Colonel Dmitry Polyakov to in late 1961 and KGB Major Aleksei Kulak to in early 1962 to "volunteer" to spy for it at the UN six months before it sent false defector Yuri Nosenko to the CIA in Geneva to discredit what a recent true defector, KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, was telling the CIA about possible KGB penetrations of itself and the intelligence services of our NATO allies?
That NYC field office?
The time limit for prosecution of lying to congress with a fake talking points memo seems to be 5 years. But the clock could be reset by bringing them back to testify again and allow them to confess or lie again.
Point being?