Incredibly important yet unknown by almost everyone who needs to know, including Pam and Kash. You stick to the facts. That’s great. But questions leap out. Downer knows the predicate is untrue and said as much to Durham. But Cantor and Thompson also know it’s untrue and they’ve said nothing. Who was responsible for the decision (or omission) not to re-interview Thompson or to interview Cantor? What were Thompson/Cantor’s motives for not speaking out or sharing the truth internally?
I’ve seen no information that Cantor/Thompson met before London but it’s interesting that both the Australian and Israeli governments have been very cooperative in posting them subsequently to the same countries at the same time.
With all the drivel on legacy media and X, it’s astonishing this story was uncovered by a handful of incredible, independent analysts working on their own time, and remains unknown by 99.99% of the people who have been affected by the lies.
Geoff, I was thinking the same thing: why haven't reporters latched onto interviewing Cantor and Thompson, now that the government is done? OTOH, if Cantor is still close the Thompson he would likely echo whatever her story is.
My take-away from the sloppy predication and Durham's lackluster is that there must be some physical law that makes people lose caring and competence once they go to Washington DC, like a quantum state duality kind of thing. I am sure Strzok, Durham and Horwitz were perfectly intelligent once they crossed the boundary on their way home from work each night.
Just like the Moscow Ritz Carlton story originated from Clinton operative Charles Dolan, Alexander Downer was also a member of the Clinton network as evidenced by his organizing an Australian grant of $25MM to the Clinton Foundation in 2006.
"...we concluded that the FFG information, provided by a government the United States Intelligence Community (USIC) deems trustworthy, and describing a first-hand account from an FFG employee of a conversation with Papadopoulos, was sufficient to predicate the investigation..."
Russia having damaging intelligence on Hillary was only a firsthand account of speculation that anyone could have made. It had no detail attached to it, not even a claim to be third or forth hand rumor. It would be like investigating for having foreknowledge of the Eagles winning the Superbowl because I predicted it.
Incredibly important yet unknown by almost everyone who needs to know, including Pam and Kash. You stick to the facts. That’s great. But questions leap out. Downer knows the predicate is untrue and said as much to Durham. But Cantor and Thompson also know it’s untrue and they’ve said nothing. Who was responsible for the decision (or omission) not to re-interview Thompson or to interview Cantor? What were Thompson/Cantor’s motives for not speaking out or sharing the truth internally?
I’ve seen no information that Cantor/Thompson met before London but it’s interesting that both the Australian and Israeli governments have been very cooperative in posting them subsequently to the same countries at the same time.
With all the drivel on legacy media and X, it’s astonishing this story was uncovered by a handful of incredible, independent analysts working on their own time, and remains unknown by 99.99% of the people who have been affected by the lies.
Geoff, I was thinking the same thing: why haven't reporters latched onto interviewing Cantor and Thompson, now that the government is done? OTOH, if Cantor is still close the Thompson he would likely echo whatever her story is.
My take-away from the sloppy predication and Durham's lackluster is that there must be some physical law that makes people lose caring and competence once they go to Washington DC, like a quantum state duality kind of thing. I am sure Strzok, Durham and Horwitz were perfectly intelligent once they crossed the boundary on their way home from work each night.
Just like the Moscow Ritz Carlton story originated from Clinton operative Charles Dolan, Alexander Downer was also a member of the Clinton network as evidenced by his organizing an Australian grant of $25MM to the Clinton Foundation in 2006.
https://thehill.com/homenews/376858-australian-diplomat-whose-tip-prompted-fbis-russia-probe-has-tie-to-clintons/
"...we concluded that the FFG information, provided by a government the United States Intelligence Community (USIC) deems trustworthy, and describing a first-hand account from an FFG employee of a conversation with Papadopoulos, was sufficient to predicate the investigation..."
Russia having damaging intelligence on Hillary was only a firsthand account of speculation that anyone could have made. It had no detail attached to it, not even a claim to be third or forth hand rumor. It would be like investigating for having foreknowledge of the Eagles winning the Superbowl because I predicted it.